Difference between revisions of "Talk:Enblend Testcase 2008-05-02"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(independent of --fine-mask switch) |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
What happens if you use the option --fine-mask ? | What happens if you use the option --fine-mask ? | ||
[[User:Seb Przd|Seb Przd]] 16:12, 19 May 2008 (CEST) | [[User:Seb Przd|Seb Przd]] 16:12, 19 May 2008 (CEST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | : While I have not run that again for cvs3036, with the version 3.1 from January I found that the outcome was independent of the '''--fine-mask''' option. Of course the detailed mask edge looks slightly different. Maybe one of the seams is winding clockwise and the other winding counterclockwise, and winding numbers +1 and -1 are treated differently? Just guessing... -- [[User:Klaus|Klaus]] 17:46, 19 May 2008 (CEST) |
Latest revision as of 17:46, 19 May 2008
What happens if you use the option --fine-mask ? Seb Przd 16:12, 19 May 2008 (CEST)
- While I have not run that again for cvs3036, with the version 3.1 from January I found that the outcome was independent of the --fine-mask option. Of course the detailed mask edge looks slightly different. Maybe one of the seams is winding clockwise and the other winding counterclockwise, and winding numbers +1 and -1 are treated differently? Just guessing... -- Klaus 17:46, 19 May 2008 (CEST)