From Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Are the red links wanted tutorials or are they to come? Would be nice to have some comment here to avoid double work. Erik Krause 06:48, 24 Apr 2005 (EDT)

who add content

I will soon add content in the following tutorials:RAW workflow with Photoshop / Retouching broken lines in Photoshop / Creating object movies with PanoTools / Philosphere

Other red links were added by me to complete this section but need also content from someone else, please fill in.....

--Pitdavos 13:26, 24 Apr 2005 (EDT)

add content

Feel free if you want to ad content for 'Stitching Nadir Shots' but please state here if you want to. May be I'll add later... Erik Krause 16:36, 24 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Rating stars

I just created a set of rating stars:

Beginner RatingStars1.jpg
Advanced RatingStars2.jpg
Pro RatingStars3.jpg

Let me know what you think about them
--Pitdavos 17:37, 27 Apr 2005 (EDT)

How about a "volume" like progress indicator using the same colors. (a bit smaller)

John - 04/27/05

Rating bars

I just created a new set of a rating system:

Beginner RatingBar1.jpg
Advanced RatingBar2.jpg
Pro RatingBar3.jpg

Let me know what you think about them
--Pitdavos 18:40, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Nice Job !

Are you going to replace all the "*" ratings with this ?

Should I? Erik? Others? --Pitdavos 04:27, 29 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Change stars ?

I think the first star graphics you created are not very clear. My first thought was that you made a mistake since all three look the same. On closer inspection, I noticed that one of the stars is in front of the other ones.

With regards to the volume bars, it is clearer, but I think the 'stars' concept is more accepted. So I would suggest to stick to showing one, two or three stars, but maybe with the 'graphical' stars.


Rating system

I think both the stars and the bars look great, although both are too large. But I think from the point of easy recognition it should be one, two or three stars. This will be best to see what is ment at first glance.

BTW.: What do you think about the naming (Basic, Nice to know, Specialised)? Erik Krause 05:39, 29 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Another set

Basic RatingStar 001.jpg
Nice to know RatingStar 002.jpg
Specialised RatingStar 003.jpg

What about these? What is the color of panoramas? ;-)
Pitdavos 15:05, 29 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Re: Another set

The color of panos? checkered? ;-)

Ok. let's take these.

Erik Krause 16:12, 29 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Categories required?

Looking at the uncategorised pages list, it looks to me like the tutorials should be categorised together using the existing star system:

  • [Category:Tutorial:Beginnner]
  • [Category:Tutorial:Intermediate]
  • [category:Tutorial:Advanced]

Another new category that might be useful would help to build the glossary page:

  • [Category:Glossary]

I know there was some dispute about this stuff before, though I can't remember how it all went.

Re: Categories required?

Good idea! But I won't use "Beginner" and so on but the names we gave the ratings on the tutorial page:

  • Basic need
  • Nice to know
  • Specialised

Could you do it? I'm short of time ATM...

--Erik Krause 15:22, 7 Nov 2005 (EST)

Re: categories

Not much time here either :-( another category could be people, since there are a few pages that are just about particular people:

  • [Category:People]

--Bruno 16:24, 7 Nov 2005 (EST)