Talk:Heads

Many of the entries on this page read a bit too much as testimonials rather than straight information. Do we need better guidelines for impartiality? If we're going to get into product reviews on these pages I'm not sure at all how we'd handle multiple POV's. I think that's a dangerous path to tread down. Thoughts?

I just edited some very promotional PR praising for the MK head. I also think we should definitely try to keep it more neutral than that. OTOH it can be useful to have some Pro and Con arguments for a head if someone knows the head from personal experience. Not that we need special guidelines, we have to have a look at pages like this one anyway. --Carl 20:16, 27 August 2007 (CEST)

to do

I sorted the commercial heads, added some redirects (pano head, panorama head), and had a look at the introduction. What we need is a good look at the product descriptions. Some of them are just outdated, some edits are pure PR praising. And I think photos would be nice... --Carl 00:04, 7 November 2007 (CET)

The article about Nodal point adapters could easily be integrated, we'd only need a redirect from "nodal point adapter" to this article. --Carl 19:32, 18 November 2007 (CET)

links checked

I checked some of the links and found quite a few dead ones. All striked through entries will be removed sooner or later, if there are no objections. --Erik Krause (talk) 21:51, 31 May 2017 (UTC)