Talk:Panotools internals
Image formats
Should this section also list which program transfers ICC profiles, exif tags or other meta data from input to output image files? I'm not sure if all of this (now listed) information would also fit into one table with "r/w" (or yes/no/n.a.) cells? Something like
application | JPG | TIFF (8 bit) | TIFF (16 bit) | TIFF (32 bit) | PNG (8 bit) | PNG (16 bit) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTStitcher | r/w | r/w | r/w | / | r/w | / |
PTMender | r/w | r/w | r/w | / | r/w | / |
nona | r/w | r/w | r/w | r/w | r/w | / |
PTGui internal stitcher | r/w | r/w | r/w | r/w | r/w | r/w |
r: read | w: write
--Carl 08:05, 13 November 2007 (CET)
Very good, but with all of the images formats ( current + PSD, PSB, EXR, HDR) a bit too large. At least I didn't have an idea how to structure it... --Erik Krause 22:03, 15 November 2007 (CET)
Oh sure, that's true. I could change x and y axis, so we need only four columns. --Carl 23:30, 15 November 2007 (CET)
file format | PTStitcher |
PTMender |
nona |
PTGui (internal stitcher) |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPG | read / write | read / write | read / write | read / write |
TIFF (8 bit) | read / write | read / write | read / write | read / write |
TIFF (16 bit) | read / write | read / write | read / write | read / write |
TIFF (32 bit) | n.a. | n.a. | read / write | read / write |
PNG (8 bit) | read / write | read / write | read / write | read / write |
PNG (16 bit) | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | read / write |
EXR | n.a. | n.a. | read / write | read / write |
HDR | n.a. | n.a. | read / write | read / write |
PSD (8 bit) single or multi layer |
write only | n.a. | n.a. | write only |
PSD (16 bit) single layer |
write only | n.a. | n.a. | write only |
PSD (16 bit) multi layer |
n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | write only |
PSB (8, 16 or 32 bit) single or multi layer |
n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | write only |
QTVR (cylindrical) | write only | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
QTVR (cubic) | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | write only |
n.a.: not available
How about this? Is it better to have read / write instead of r / w? n.a. is now in italics... --Carl 10:14, 16 November 2007 (CET)