Talk:User Guidelines - Revision history

Thomas Rauscher: /* Valid email address */ voted

2007-05-17T16:04:52Z

‎Valid email address: voted

Zarl: Valid email address

2007-05-17T15:13:21Z

Valid email address

Bruno: Some minor typos need correcting

2006-10-30T12:01:45Z

Some minor typos need correcting

Roger: /* Minor points */

2006-08-04T07:57:14Z

‎Minor points

Roger: /* Minor points */

2006-08-04T07:56:32Z

‎Minor points

KathyW: Points raised on-list

2006-08-03T00:48:03Z

Points raised on-list

Erik Krause at 10:18, 2 August 2006

2006-08-02T10:18:57Z

KathyW: /* Minor points */

2006-08-02T05:34:30Z

‎Minor points

KathyW: /* Little things ... */

2006-08-02T05:27:49Z

‎Little things ...

Roger: Minor points

2006-08-02T00:45:09Z

Minor points

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:04, 17 May 2007
Line 57:		Line 57:
	* '''use a valid email address.''' As a member you have the choice between different flavours of communicating with the group, however we have to ask for a working email address delivered when joining the group so the moderators can contact you if needed. The moderators of Panotools NG and -list will make every effort to protect your privacy!		* '''use a valid email address.''' As a member you have the choice between different flavours of communicating with the group, however we have to ask for a working email address delivered when joining the group so the moderators can contact you if needed. The moderators of Panotools NG and -list will make every effort to protect your privacy!
	Background: moderators need to be able to contact group members effectively. Especially with new members sometimes issues need to be sorted out prior to approval, e.g. due to lack of information in a user's profile. A notice is already on [http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/ NG's description] but should also be added to -list's description. [[User:Zarl\|Carl]] 17:13, 17 May 2007 (CEST)		Background: moderators need to be able to contact group members effectively. Especially with new members sometimes issues need to be sorted out prior to approval, e.g. due to lack of information in a user's profile. A notice is already on [http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/ NG's description] but should also be added to -list's description. [[User:Zarl\|Carl]] 17:13, 17 May 2007 (CEST)
		+	* '''Aye''' --[[User:Thomas Rauscher\|thomas]] 18:04, 17 May 2007 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:13, 17 May 2007
Line 50:		Line 50:

	[[User:Bruno\|Bruno]] 13:01, 30 October 2006 (CET)		[[User:Bruno\|Bruno]] 13:01, 30 October 2006 (CET)
		+
		+
		+	== Valid email address ==
		+
		+	I propose a new first point for "''Joint common ground''" of the '''User Guidelines''':
		+	* '''use a valid email address.''' As a member you have the choice between different flavours of communicating with the group, however we have to ask for a working email address delivered when joining the group so the moderators can contact you if needed. The moderators of Panotools NG and -list will make every effort to protect your privacy!
		+	Background: moderators need to be able to contact group members effectively. Especially with new members sometimes issues need to be sorted out prior to approval, e.g. due to lack of information in a user's profile. A notice is already on [http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/PanoToolsNG/ NG's description] but should also be added to -list's description. [[User:Zarl\|Carl]] 17:13, 17 May 2007 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:01, 30 October 2006
Line 39:		Line 39:

	'''Members must respect the copyright and intellectual property of others''' - members and non-members. This is a ban-worthy offense on first violation if its intentional. Clearly violating the copyright of other panographers will not be tolerated.		'''Members must respect the copyright and intellectual property of others''' - members and non-members. This is a ban-worthy offense on first violation if its intentional. Clearly violating the copyright of other panographers will not be tolerated.
		+
		+	== Some minor typos need correcting ==
		+
		+	* Introduction: issuess -> issues
		+	* Joint common ground: adress -> address
		+	* Please don't feed the Trolls: Troll get's the -> Troll gets the
		+	* PanotoolsNG: other members behavior -> other member's behavior
		+	* PanotoolsNG: commercial announcments -> commercial announcements
		+	* Moderators Authorities: separat mailing list -> separate mailing list
		+
		+	[[User:Bruno\|Bruno]] 13:01, 30 October 2006 (CET)

@@ Line 32: / Line 32: @@
 I put it intentionally as it is now. The reason is that many posts sound like a chat. The only reason I can think of is that users forgot that they are posting to a list<small>--[[User:Erik Krause|Erik Krause]] 12:18, 2 August 2006 (CEST)</small>
-Hmmm. In that case it's probably better as it is now. Suggestion withdrawn.
+<Roger Williams>Hmmm. In that case it's probably better as it is now. Suggestion withdrawn.
 == Points raised on-list ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:56, 4 August 2006
Line 31:		Line 31:

	I put it intentionally as it is now. The reason is that many posts sound like a chat. The only reason I can think of is that users forgot that they are posting to a list<small>--[[User:Erik Krause\|Erik Krause]] 12:18, 2 August 2006 (CEST)</small>		I put it intentionally as it is now. The reason is that many posts sound like a chat. The only reason I can think of is that users forgot that they are posting to a list<small>--[[User:Erik Krause\|Erik Krause]] 12:18, 2 August 2006 (CEST)</small>
		+
		+	Hmmm. In that case it's probably better as it is now. Suggestion withdrawn.

	== Points raised on-list ==		== Points raised on-list ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:48, 3 August 2006
Line 31:		Line 31:

	I put it intentionally as it is now. The reason is that many posts sound like a chat. The only reason I can think of is that users forgot that they are posting to a list<small>--[[User:Erik Krause\|Erik Krause]] 12:18, 2 August 2006 (CEST)</small>		I put it intentionally as it is now. The reason is that many posts sound like a chat. The only reason I can think of is that users forgot that they are posting to a list<small>--[[User:Erik Krause\|Erik Krause]] 12:18, 2 August 2006 (CEST)</small>
		+
		+	== Points raised on-list ==
		+
		+	'''Please respect listmembers privacy'''. Do not abuse listmembers email addresses. eMail Harvesting or facilitation of harvesting is in breach of Yahoo Groups terms and the rules of this list, is an invasion of privacy and will not be tolerated.
		+
		+	'''Members must respect the copyright and intellectual property of others''' - members and non-members. This is a ban-worthy offense on first violation if its intentional. Clearly violating the copyright of other panographers will not be tolerated.

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:18, 2 August 2006
Line 29:		Line 29:

	<KathyW> I dunno Roger, I like the way it reads now. Other thoughts? </KathyW> <small>[[User:KathyW\|KathyW]] 07:34, 2 August 2006 (CEST)</small>		<KathyW> I dunno Roger, I like the way it reads now. Other thoughts? </KathyW> <small>[[User:KathyW\|KathyW]] 07:34, 2 August 2006 (CEST)</small>
		+
		+	I put it intentionally as it is now. The reason is that many posts sound like a chat. The only reason I can think of is that users forgot that they are posting to a list<small>--[[User:Erik Krause\|Erik Krause]] 12:18, 2 August 2006 (CEST)</small>

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 Someone could say to themselves, "There may be no NEED but where's
 the harm?" I suggest "Fancy formatting is unhelpful, and to be avoided."
 Also, the heading "Please remember you are posting to a forum" might
@@ Line 25: / Line 27: @@
 In which case the text could continue:
 "If you post to the list, it will be read by a lot of users, not..." (continuing as it is now)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:27, 2 August 2006
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Use the [+] button above to add a comment, suggestion or critics.		Use the [+] button above to add a comment, suggestion or critics.

−	~~== Little things ... ==~~

−	~~In '''Moderator Responsibilities''' "The main gaul of a moderator" should be "The main goal of a moderator" ?? <small>[[User:KathyW\|KathyW]] 04:01, 1 August 2006 (CEST)</small>~~

	== Yuv's suggestion ... ==		== Yuv's suggestion ... ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:45, 2 August 2006
Line 14:		Line 14:

	I'll change it...<small>--[[User:Erik\|Erik Krause]] 10:35, 1 August 2006 (CEST)</small>		I'll change it...<small>--[[User:Erik\|Erik Krause]] 10:35, 1 August 2006 (CEST)</small>
		+
		+	== Minor points ==
		+
		+	I wonder if "no need for fancy formatting" is a little too permissive?
		+	Someone could say to themselves, "There may be no NEED but where's
		+	the harm?" I suggest "Fancy formatting is unhelpful, and to be avoided."
		+
		+	Also, the heading "Please remember you are posting to a forum" might
		+	be better put the other way around, as below:
		+
		+	"Please reply privately if the content is not of general interest"
		+	In which case the text could continue:
		+	"If you post to the list, it will be read by a lot of users, not..." (continuing as it is now)