Talk:User Guidelines

From PanoTools.org Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Little things ...)
(Minor points)
Line 18: Line 18:
 
Someone could say to themselves, "There may be no NEED but where's
 
Someone could say to themselves, "There may be no NEED but where's
 
the harm?" I suggest "Fancy formatting is unhelpful, and to be avoided."
 
the harm?" I suggest "Fancy formatting is unhelpful, and to be avoided."
 +
 +
<KathyW> ...or leave off the whole "no need for fancy formatting" - making that point short, precise and self explanatory?? </KathyW> <small>[[User:KathyW|KathyW]] 07:34, 2 August 2006 (CEST)</small>
  
 
Also, the heading "Please remember you are posting to a forum" might
 
Also, the heading "Please remember you are posting to a forum" might
Line 25: Line 27:
 
In which case the text could continue:
 
In which case the text could continue:
 
"If you post to the list, it will be read by a lot of users, not..." (continuing as it is now)
 
"If you post to the list, it will be read by a lot of users, not..." (continuing as it is now)
 +
 +
<KathyW> I dunno Roger, I like the way it reads now. Other thoughts? </KathyW> <small>[[User:KathyW|KathyW]] 07:34, 2 August 2006 (CEST)</small>

Revision as of 07:34, 2 August 2006

Please discuss User Guidelines here

Use the [+] button above to add a comment, suggestion or critics.


Yuv's suggestion ...

Please be ethical in your postings. "This means you should fully disclose all vested interests (professional, commercial or others) and your relationship to the topic you comment on."

It does sound better ... any other comments? KathyW 04:10, 1 August 2006 (CEST)

I'll change it...--Erik Krause 10:35, 1 August 2006 (CEST)

Minor points

I wonder if "no need for fancy formatting" is a little too permissive? Someone could say to themselves, "There may be no NEED but where's the harm?" I suggest "Fancy formatting is unhelpful, and to be avoided."

<KathyW> ...or leave off the whole "no need for fancy formatting" - making that point short, precise and self explanatory?? </KathyW> KathyW 07:34, 2 August 2006 (CEST)

Also, the heading "Please remember you are posting to a forum" might be better put the other way around, as below:

"Please reply privately if the content is not of general interest" In which case the text could continue: "If you post to the list, it will be read by a lot of users, not..." (continuing as it is now)

<KathyW> I dunno Roger, I like the way it reads now. Other thoughts? </KathyW> KathyW 07:34, 2 August 2006 (CEST)

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
tools
Tools