Talk:Tutorials

From PanoTools.org Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(add content)
m (Categories)
 
(28 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
== add content ==
 
== add content ==
  
Feel free if you want to ad content for 'Stitching Nadir Shots' but please stae here if you want to. May be I'll add later...
+
Feel free if you want to ad content for '[[Stitching Nadir Shots]]' but please state here if you want to. May be I'll add later...
 
[[User:Erik Krause|Erik Krause]] 16:36, 24 Apr 2005 (EDT)
 
[[User:Erik Krause|Erik Krause]] 16:36, 24 Apr 2005 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Rating stars ==
 +
 +
I just created a set of rating stars:<br>
 +
<br>
 +
Beginner [[Image:RatingStars1.jpg]]<br>
 +
Advanced [[Image:RatingStars2.jpg]]<br>
 +
Pro      [[Image:RatingStars3.jpg]]<br>
 +
<br>
 +
Let me know what you think about them<br>
 +
--[[User:Pitdavos|Pitdavos]] 17:37, 27 Apr 2005 (EDT)
 +
 +
 +
----
 +
How about a "volume" like progress indicator using the same colors. (a bit smaller)
 +
 +
John - 04/27/05
 +
 +
----
 +
 +
== Rating bars ==
 +
 +
I just created a new set of a rating system:<br>
 +
<br>
 +
Beginner [[Image:RatingBar1.jpg]]<br>
 +
Advanced [[Image:RatingBar2.jpg]]<br>
 +
Pro      [[Image:RatingBar3.jpg]]<br>
 +
<br>
 +
Let me know what you think about them<br>
 +
--[[User:Pitdavos|Pitdavos]] 18:40, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)
 +
 +
 +
----
 +
 +
Nice Job !
 +
 +
Are you going to replace all the "*" ratings with this ?
 +
 +
----
 +
 +
Should I? Erik? Others?
 +
--[[User:Pitdavos|Pitdavos]] 04:27, 29 Apr 2005 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Change stars ? ==
 +
 +
I think the first star graphics you created are not very clear.
 +
My first thought was that you made a mistake since all three look the same.
 +
On closer inspection, I noticed that one of the stars is in front of the other ones.
 +
 +
With regards to the volume bars, it is clearer, but I think the 'stars' concept is more accepted.
 +
So I would suggest to stick to showing one, two or three stars, but maybe with the 'graphical' stars.
 +
 +
Richard
 +
 +
== Rating system ==
 +
 +
I think both the stars and the bars look great, although both are too large. But I think from the point of easy recognition it should be one, two or three stars. This will be best to see what is ment at first glance.
 +
 +
BTW.: What do you think about the naming (Basic, Nice to know, Specialised)?
 +
<small>[[User:Erik Krause|Erik Krause]] 05:39, 29 Apr 2005 (EDT)</small>
 +
 +
== Another set ==
 +
 +
Basic [[Image:RatingStar_001.jpg]]<br>
 +
Nice to know [[Image:RatingStar_002.jpg]]<br>
 +
Specialised [[Image:RatingStar_003.jpg]]<br>
 +
<br>
 +
What about these? What is the color of panoramas? ;-)<br>
 +
<small>[[User:Pitdavos|Pitdavos]] 15:05, 29 Apr 2005 (EDT)</small>
 +
 +
== Re: Another set ==
 +
 +
The color of panos? checkered? ;-)
 +
 +
Ok. let's take these.
 +
 +
<small>[[User:Erik Krause|Erik Krause]] 16:12, 29 Apr 2005 (EDT)</small>
 +
 +
== Categories required? ==
 +
 +
Looking at the [[Special:Uncategorizedpages| uncategorised pages]] list,
 +
it looks to me like the tutorials should be categorised together using
 +
the existing star system:
 +
 +
* [Category:Tutorial:Beginnner]
 +
* [Category:Tutorial:Intermediate]
 +
* [category:Tutorial:Advanced]
 +
 +
Another new category that might be useful would help to build the glossary page:
 +
 +
* [Category:Glossary]
 +
 +
I know there was some dispute about this stuff before, though I can't remember how it all went.
 +
 +
== Re:  Categories required? ==
 +
 +
Good idea! But I won't use "Beginner" and so on but the names we gave the ratings on the tutorial page:
 +
* Basic need
 +
* Nice to know
 +
* Specialised
 +
 +
Could you do it? I'm short of time ATM...
 +
 +
<small>--[[User:Erik Krause|Erik Krause]] 15:22, 7 Nov 2005 (EST)</small>
 +
 +
== Re: categories ==
 +
 +
Not much time here either :-( another category could be '''people''', since there are a few pages
 +
that are just about particular people:
 +
 +
* [Category:People]
 +
 +
<small>--[[User:Bruno|Bruno]] 16:24, 7 Nov 2005 (EST)</small>

Latest revision as of 22:24, 7 November 2005

Are the red links wanted tutorials or are they to come? Would be nice to have some comment here to avoid double work. Erik Krause 06:48, 24 Apr 2005 (EDT)

Contents

[edit] who add content

I will soon add content in the following tutorials:RAW workflow with Photoshop / Retouching broken lines in Photoshop / Creating object movies with PanoTools / Philosphere

Other red links were added by me to complete this section but need also content from someone else, please fill in.....

--Pitdavos 13:26, 24 Apr 2005 (EDT)

[edit] add content

Feel free if you want to ad content for 'Stitching Nadir Shots' but please state here if you want to. May be I'll add later... Erik Krause 16:36, 24 Apr 2005 (EDT)

[edit] Rating stars

I just created a set of rating stars:

Beginner RatingStars1.jpg
Advanced RatingStars2.jpg
Pro RatingStars3.jpg

Let me know what you think about them
--Pitdavos 17:37, 27 Apr 2005 (EDT)



How about a "volume" like progress indicator using the same colors. (a bit smaller)

John - 04/27/05


[edit] Rating bars

I just created a new set of a rating system:

Beginner RatingBar1.jpg
Advanced RatingBar2.jpg
Pro RatingBar3.jpg

Let me know what you think about them
--Pitdavos 18:40, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)



Nice Job !

Are you going to replace all the "*" ratings with this ?


Should I? Erik? Others? --Pitdavos 04:27, 29 Apr 2005 (EDT)

[edit] Change stars ?

I think the first star graphics you created are not very clear. My first thought was that you made a mistake since all three look the same. On closer inspection, I noticed that one of the stars is in front of the other ones.

With regards to the volume bars, it is clearer, but I think the 'stars' concept is more accepted. So I would suggest to stick to showing one, two or three stars, but maybe with the 'graphical' stars.

Richard

[edit] Rating system

I think both the stars and the bars look great, although both are too large. But I think from the point of easy recognition it should be one, two or three stars. This will be best to see what is ment at first glance.

BTW.: What do you think about the naming (Basic, Nice to know, Specialised)? Erik Krause 05:39, 29 Apr 2005 (EDT)

[edit] Another set

Basic RatingStar 001.jpg
Nice to know RatingStar 002.jpg
Specialised RatingStar 003.jpg

What about these? What is the color of panoramas? ;-)
Pitdavos 15:05, 29 Apr 2005 (EDT)

[edit] Re: Another set

The color of panos? checkered? ;-)

Ok. let's take these.

Erik Krause 16:12, 29 Apr 2005 (EDT)

[edit] Categories required?

Looking at the uncategorised pages list, it looks to me like the tutorials should be categorised together using the existing star system:

  • [Category:Tutorial:Beginnner]
  • [Category:Tutorial:Intermediate]
  • [category:Tutorial:Advanced]

Another new category that might be useful would help to build the glossary page:

  • [Category:Glossary]

I know there was some dispute about this stuff before, though I can't remember how it all went.

[edit] Re: Categories required?

Good idea! But I won't use "Beginner" and so on but the names we gave the ratings on the tutorial page:

  • Basic need
  • Nice to know
  • Specialised

Could you do it? I'm short of time ATM...

--Erik Krause 15:22, 7 Nov 2005 (EST)

[edit] Re: categories

Not much time here either :-( another category could be people, since there are a few pages that are just about particular people:

  • [Category:People]

--Bruno 16:24, 7 Nov 2005 (EST)

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
tools
Tools