Talk:Panotools internals

From PanoTools.org Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Image formats: 4 columns for the applications and rows for the formats)
Line 22: Line 22:
  
 
Very good, but with all of the images formats ( current + PSD, PSB, EXR, HDR) a bit too large. At least I didn't have an idea how to structure it... <small>--[[User:Erik Krause|Erik Krause]] 22:03, 15 November 2007 (CET)</small>
 
Very good, but with all of the images formats ( current + PSD, PSB, EXR, HDR) a bit too large. At least I didn't have an idea how to structure it... <small>--[[User:Erik Krause|Erik Krause]] 22:03, 15 November 2007 (CET)</small>
 +
 +
Oh sure, that's true. I could change x and y axis, so we need only four columns.  <small>--[[User:Zarl|Carl]] 23:30, 15 November 2007 (CET)</small>

Revision as of 00:30, 16 November 2007

Image formats

Should this section also list which program transfers ICC profiles, exif tags or other meta data from input to output image files? I'm not sure if all of this (now listed) information would also fit into one table with "r/w" (or yes/no/n.a.) cells? Something like

application JPG TIFF (8 bit) TIFF (16 bit) TIFF (32 bit) PNG (8 bit) PNG (16 bit)
PTStitcher r/w r/w r/w / r/w /
PTMender r/w r/w r/w / r/w /
nona r/w r/w r/w r/w r/w /
PTGui internal stitcher r/w r/w r/w r/w r/w r/w

r: read | w: write
--Carl 08:05, 13 November 2007 (CET)

Very good, but with all of the images formats ( current + PSD, PSB, EXR, HDR) a bit too large. At least I didn't have an idea how to structure it... --Erik Krause 22:03, 15 November 2007 (CET)

Oh sure, that's true. I could change x and y axis, so we need only four columns. --Carl 23:30, 15 November 2007 (CET)

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
tools
Tools