Difference between revisions of "Talk:Message Archives"
(statement about nabble) |
Erik Krause (talk | contribs) (moved gmane comment to discussion) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Yes, John Spikowski delete both the Nabble and the Gmane archive to increase his ranking in Google for higher revenues from AdSense. There was an ongoing discussion about Nabble but I guess now we are sure that it will stay. After the moderator poll it would be a good point for a discussion to import the old archives into Nabble. <small>--[[User:Thomas Rauscher|thomas]] 16:45, 15 November 2006 (CET)</small> | Yes, John Spikowski delete both the Nabble and the Gmane archive to increase his ranking in Google for higher revenues from AdSense. There was an ongoing discussion about Nabble but I guess now we are sure that it will stay. After the moderator poll it would be a good point for a discussion to import the old archives into Nabble. <small>--[[User:Thomas Rauscher|thomas]] 16:45, 15 November 2006 (CET)</small> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Gmane feed of PanotoolsNG was discontiued on 16 Sept. 06 due to a user poll. The reason was that gmane reveals user email adresses in a human only readable form and refused to change that policy. <small>--[[User:Erik Krause|Erik Krause]] 20:23, 21 March 2007 (CET)</small> | ||
Latest revision as of 21:23, 21 March 2007
The PanoTools nabble link gives 'this forum has been deleted'.
There is a PanoToolsNG nabble archive, which is the one linked-to in the panotoolsng email footer, but it only has messages going back to July 2006.
Bruno 16:34, 14 November 2006 (CET)
Yes, John Spikowski delete both the Nabble and the Gmane archive to increase his ranking in Google for higher revenues from AdSense. There was an ongoing discussion about Nabble but I guess now we are sure that it will stay. After the moderator poll it would be a good point for a discussion to import the old archives into Nabble. --thomas 16:45, 15 November 2006 (CET)
Gmane feed of PanotoolsNG was discontiued on 16 Sept. 06 due to a user poll. The reason was that gmane reveals user email adresses in a human only readable form and refused to change that policy. --Erik Krause 20:23, 21 March 2007 (CET)