Difference between revisions of "Talk:Heads"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Rogerhoward (talk | contribs) (Impartiality?) |
(it's a hardware overview, no promo talk contest) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Many of the entries on this page read a bit too much as testimonials rather than straight information. Do we need better guidelines for impartiality? If we're going to get into product reviews on these pages I'm not sure at all how we'd handle multiple POV's. I think that's a dangerous path to tread down. Thoughts? | Many of the entries on this page read a bit too much as testimonials rather than straight information. Do we need better guidelines for impartiality? If we're going to get into product reviews on these pages I'm not sure at all how we'd handle multiple POV's. I think that's a dangerous path to tread down. Thoughts? | ||
| + | |||
| + | I just edited some very promotional PR praising for the MK head. I also think we should definitely try to keep it more neutral than that. OTOH it can be useful to have some Pro and Con arguments for a head if someone knows the head from personal experience. Not that we need special guidelines, we have to have a look at pages like this one anyway. <small>--[[User:Zarl|Carl]] 20:16, 27 August 2007 (CEST)</small> | ||
Revision as of 20:16, 27 August 2007
Many of the entries on this page read a bit too much as testimonials rather than straight information. Do we need better guidelines for impartiality? If we're going to get into product reviews on these pages I'm not sure at all how we'd handle multiple POV's. I think that's a dangerous path to tread down. Thoughts?
I just edited some very promotional PR praising for the MK head. I also think we should definitely try to keep it more neutral than that. OTOH it can be useful to have some Pro and Con arguments for a head if someone knows the head from personal experience. Not that we need special guidelines, we have to have a look at pages like this one anyway. --Carl 20:16, 27 August 2007 (CEST)