Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hardware manufacturers"

From PanoTools.org Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Descriptions: I suggest a table)
(Descriptions: table is nice)
Line 5: Line 5:
 
Maybe a table would better fit for this propose? Colums would be e.g. "Name, Website, Products, Comments" and the whole list alphabetically sorted, so the page wouldn't look that sparse?
 
Maybe a table would better fit for this propose? Colums would be e.g. "Name, Website, Products, Comments" and the whole list alphabetically sorted, so the page wouldn't look that sparse?
 
<small>--[[User:Thomas Rauscher|thomas]] 13:11, 26 May 2007 (CEST)</small>
 
<small>--[[User:Thomas Rauscher|thomas]] 13:11, 26 May 2007 (CEST)</small>
 +
 +
Good idea. Since it's about hardware products we could also introduce some keywords that can help finding products, e.g. "panorama heads", "poles", "adapters", "tripods/monopods" (maybe also camera and lens manufacturers) and explain in the comment field if it's about high-end or low-budget solutions or something in between. <small>--[[User:Zarl|Carl]] 13:53, 26 May 2007 (CEST)</small>

Revision as of 11:53, 26 May 2007

Descriptions

After deleting some spam (see history) it looks to me as if we need to add some short and neutral descriptions of what kind of products are available from each manufacturer. Carl 13:03, 25 May 2007 (CEST)

Maybe a table would better fit for this propose? Colums would be e.g. "Name, Website, Products, Comments" and the whole list alphabetically sorted, so the page wouldn't look that sparse? --thomas 13:11, 26 May 2007 (CEST)

Good idea. Since it's about hardware products we could also introduce some keywords that can help finding products, e.g. "panorama heads", "poles", "adapters", "tripods/monopods" (maybe also camera and lens manufacturers) and explain in the comment field if it's about high-end or low-budget solutions or something in between. --Carl 13:53, 26 May 2007 (CEST)