Difference between revisions of "Talk:Development of Open Source tools"

From PanoTools.org Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (What category?)
 
m
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
The category is important since some generated lists like [[SiteMap]] or [[Software]] rely on the category. <small>--[[User:Erik Krause|Erik Krause]] 20:46, 4 February 2008 (CET)</small>
 
The category is important since some generated lists like [[SiteMap]] or [[Software]] rely on the category. <small>--[[User:Erik Krause|Erik Krause]] 20:46, 4 February 2008 (CET)</small>
 +
 +
:Perhaps this uncertainty comes from the fact that the beginning is about OS development in general, whereas the rest is hugin special. Since the page is pretty long, perhaps the hugin development section should go to [[Hugin development]] <small>--[[User:Erik Krause|Erik Krause]] 20:53, 4 February 2008 (CET)</small>
 +
 +
:neat problem :-) as community driven software development it belongs in both categories. Do we have to choose a unique category? <small>--[[User:Yuval|Yuval]] 02:35, 6 February 2008 (CET)</small>
 +
:: There can be as many categories as you like. However, I still think the article should be split, since the first part is what the title says but the second part is only hugin. According to the title it would be possible to add info about more tools and the article would grow cluttered ... <small>--[[User:Erik Krause|Erik Krause]] 11:51, 7 February 2008 (CET)</small>

Latest revision as of 12:51, 7 February 2008

What category?

I'm a bit uncertain in which category this page would fit. All of the Software:Platform categories would fit only partially, because it's not directly about a program like the other pages in the category. Community:Project would probably be ok. Or shall we have a new category?

The category is important since some generated lists like SiteMap or Software rely on the category. --Erik Krause 20:46, 4 February 2008 (CET)

Perhaps this uncertainty comes from the fact that the beginning is about OS development in general, whereas the rest is hugin special. Since the page is pretty long, perhaps the hugin development section should go to Hugin development --Erik Krause 20:53, 4 February 2008 (CET)
neat problem :-) as community driven software development it belongs in both categories. Do we have to choose a unique category? --Yuval 02:35, 6 February 2008 (CET)
There can be as many categories as you like. However, I still think the article should be split, since the first part is what the title says but the second part is only hugin. According to the title it would be possible to add info about more tools and the article would grow cluttered ... --Erik Krause 11:51, 7 February 2008 (CET)