Dust Removal with Flatfield

From PanoTools.org Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(first lines on flatfield)
 
(text recycling - to be edited)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
Flatfields may also be used to correct [[vignetting]], or vignetting correction and dust removal combined. But even with hugin 0.7 using a parametrisation approach for vignetting, a suitably prepared flatfield is useful for dust removal. -- [[User:Klaus|Klaus]] 19:11, 2 December 2007 (CET)
 
Flatfields may also be used to correct [[vignetting]], or vignetting correction and dust removal combined. But even with hugin 0.7 using a parametrisation approach for vignetting, a suitably prepared flatfield is useful for dust removal. -- [[User:Klaus|Klaus]] 19:11, 2 December 2007 (CET)
 +
 +
<h1>Plea for Flatfield</h1>
 +
 +
<p>
 +
<img width=640 height=480 alt="foto" src="flatfield3.jpg"><br>
 +
This is a photo with dust in the lense. Here it is rather visible,
 +
as my camera sometimes had the habit of showing a focussed image
 +
of the dust specks as well. I have downscaled the images.
 +
<p>
 +
Shortly later the camera fell into that habit again, and I had a
 +
whiteboard nearby, so I set the lense aperture to the same value
 +
and took a photo of the featureless whiteboard.
 +
<p>
 +
<img width=640 height=480 alt="foto" src="flatfield1.jpg"><br>
 +
It is rather dark, but it shows the same dust specks
 +
as the photo I want to correct.
 +
<p>
 +
<img width=640 height=480 alt="foto" src="flatfield2.jpg"><br>
 +
After some brightness adjustment and blurring (details on request)
 +
with the gimp here is now the flatfield as used in the layer
 +
with the mode set to "divide".
 +
<p>
 +
<img width=640 height=480 alt="foto" src="flatfield3.jpg"><br>
 +
Once again the uncorrected photo.
 +
 +
<p>
 +
<img width=640 height=480 alt="foto" src="flatfield4.jpg"><br>
 +
<p>
 +
And here the corrected photo. If one looks closely I did not get
 +
the flatfield completely right in the upper half of the image,
 +
as the white is blown the dust specks in  the sky are under-corrected.
 +
See in particular the top left corner. with a little more time
 +
I probably could produce a better flatfield version. But the specks
 +
on the runway are pretty much gone.
 +
<p>
 +
I show this example with a view towards hugin, where recently a
 +
flatfield image was available but the most recent beta release
 +
does no longer have it in the GUI. In particular within a
 +
panorama stitch the dust specks have the nasty habit of showing up
 +
several times and forming a repetitive pattern which your eye
 +
is faster to spot than a single spot positioned at random.
 +
<p>

Revision as of 20:26, 2 December 2007

Dust can get into camera optics. In panorama images created from such photos the repetitive pattern can be particulary irritating, as a dust speck or a dust speck pattern tends to show up multiple times.

One can prepare a flatfield for correction. While one may correct the input files prior to stitching precessing each with the gimp for example, a much smoother workflow results if the stitching software itself provides for the use of a flatfield.

Flatfields may also be used to correct vignetting, or vignetting correction and dust removal combined. But even with hugin 0.7 using a parametrisation approach for vignetting, a suitably prepared flatfield is useful for dust removal. -- Klaus 19:11, 2 December 2007 (CET)

Plea for Flatfield

<img width=640 height=480 alt="foto" src="flatfield3.jpg">
This is a photo with dust in the lense. Here it is rather visible, as my camera sometimes had the habit of showing a focussed image of the dust specks as well. I have downscaled the images. <p> Shortly later the camera fell into that habit again, and I had a whiteboard nearby, so I set the lense aperture to the same value and took a photo of the featureless whiteboard. <p> <img width=640 height=480 alt="foto" src="flatfield1.jpg">
It is rather dark, but it shows the same dust specks as the photo I want to correct. <p> <img width=640 height=480 alt="foto" src="flatfield2.jpg">
After some brightness adjustment and blurring (details on request) with the gimp here is now the flatfield as used in the layer with the mode set to "divide". <p> <img width=640 height=480 alt="foto" src="flatfield3.jpg">
Once again the uncorrected photo. <p> <img width=640 height=480 alt="foto" src="flatfield4.jpg">
<p> And here the corrected photo. If one looks closely I did not get the flatfield completely right in the upper half of the image, as the white is blown the dust specks in the sky are under-corrected. See in particular the top left corner. with a little more time I probably could produce a better flatfield version. But the specks on the runway are pretty much gone. <p> I show this example with a view towards hugin, where recently a flatfield image was available but the most recent beta release does no longer have it in the GUI. In particular within a panorama stitch the dust specks have the nasty habit of showing up several times and forming a repetitive pattern which your eye is faster to spot than a single spot positioned at random. <p>

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
tools
Tools